Contract Remedies For Duress, Undue Influence, And Other Contractual Evils
In Daniels v Daniels, the court grappled with contract remedies for situations involving undue influence, duress, unconscionability, fraud, and mistake. Duress results from coercive or intimidating behavior, compelling a party to act out of fear. Undue influence involves pressure and manipulation, exploiting vulnerability. Unconscionability arises when contracts exhibit marked inequality and injustice. Fraud occurs when…